<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ellen Lee and The Great Leap Backwards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/</link>
	<description>Lifetime guarantee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Agagooga</title>
		<link>http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>Agagooga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/#comment-854</guid>
		<description>The fact is that when it comes to sex crimes, men are disadvantaged compared to women.

It&#039;s almost as if, or is as if, the principle has changed to &quot;guilty until proven innocent&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is that when it comes to sex crimes, men are disadvantaged compared to women.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost as if, or is as if, the principle has changed to &#8220;guilty until proven innocent&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Purba Negoro</title>
		<link>http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>Purba Negoro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/#comment-760</guid>
		<description>What a load of shit.
All women want a decent fucking- she cries after so what.
Women cry over a frickin kitten in a commercial.

Marital Rape- what an oxymoron if ever there was one.
Perhaps if she didn&#039;t use sex as a barginaining tool for her petty and often selfish and emotive reasons (ie &quot;he forget my special day (insert arbitrary sentimentalist bullshit here) - so no sex for him&quot; mentality)- &#039;rape&#039; or more accurately Moderately Persuasioned Marital Relations would be unnecessary. Serve these women right for keeping their knees locked up on their men. That&#039;&#039;ll learn them- a good rough fuck- even better up the anus to really put her back into line.
Sometimes words are ineffective on the emotively voltile and intellectually inferior fairer sex.

You horrid feminists are pathetic emotive non-rational shrill women who need to keep their hands busy by making my supper. 
Your entire dogma is one subjective emotive fallacy completely uncorroborated by any empirical data shoddily built upon another. Like a house of Tort cards or Goddess cards or whatever you intellectual incompetents use to avert reality. Feminism stands up to neither Logic nor Empirical scrutiny-0 thus is intellectual paucity at its&#039; worst.
It is but the self-indulgent textual onanisms of a frustrated disaffected unattractive cabal of sexually ambivalent or androgenically challenged women.

I sneer upon you all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a load of shit.<br />
All women want a decent fucking- she cries after so what.<br />
Women cry over a frickin kitten in a commercial.</p>
<p>Marital Rape- what an oxymoron if ever there was one.<br />
Perhaps if she didn&#8217;t use sex as a barginaining tool for her petty and often selfish and emotive reasons (ie &#8220;he forget my special day (insert arbitrary sentimentalist bullshit here) &#8211; so no sex for him&#8221; mentality)- &#8216;rape&#8217; or more accurately Moderately Persuasioned Marital Relations would be unnecessary. Serve these women right for keeping their knees locked up on their men. That&#8221;ll learn them- a good rough fuck- even better up the anus to really put her back into line.<br />
Sometimes words are ineffective on the emotively voltile and intellectually inferior fairer sex.</p>
<p>You horrid feminists are pathetic emotive non-rational shrill women who need to keep their hands busy by making my supper.<br />
Your entire dogma is one subjective emotive fallacy completely uncorroborated by any empirical data shoddily built upon another. Like a house of Tort cards or Goddess cards or whatever you intellectual incompetents use to avert reality. Feminism stands up to neither Logic nor Empirical scrutiny-0 thus is intellectual paucity at its&#8217; worst.<br />
It is but the self-indulgent textual onanisms of a frustrated disaffected unattractive cabal of sexually ambivalent or androgenically challenged women.</p>
<p>I sneer upon you all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pleinelune</title>
		<link>http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>pleinelune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>So you rather deprive women of ALL possible recourse under the law, just to avoid the distant possibility that a man might be wrongly accused? By your reasoning, we should abolish the penal code entirely, so that people will never be falsely accused.

Why do we have courts? So that people can be given a fair trial - we obviously do not chuck accused people in jail straightaway. False accusations happen all the time in criminal law, it is not limited to rape or marital rape. So why should we given marital rape special treatment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you rather deprive women of ALL possible recourse under the law, just to avoid the distant possibility that a man might be wrongly accused? By your reasoning, we should abolish the penal code entirely, so that people will never be falsely accused.</p>
<p>Why do we have courts? So that people can be given a fair trial &#8211; we obviously do not chuck accused people in jail straightaway. False accusations happen all the time in criminal law, it is not limited to rape or marital rape. So why should we given marital rape special treatment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoiceofReason</title>
		<link>http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>VoiceofReason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>&quot;After getting through this humiliating hurdle, there are the lawyers, the courts, the media. Many rape victims drop their cases mid-way.&quot;

Who do you think will be humiliated more? The man accused or the woman victim? It is highly untrue to portray, as you have, possible rape victims to be the SOLE victims. Wont it be more traumatizing for the man who has to go through a false criminal charge by a woman he considers close to him? 

As for the reasons why woman would wish to cry rape, they are plentiful:

http://americandaily.com/article/14242

In family law proceedings there are a multitude of important and emotionally-charged issues which are often contested and re-contested over many years. These include: legal and physical custody; child support; alimony; division of marital assets; liability for legal, health care and child care expenses; requests for relocation; and others. False accusations often allow accusers to gain leverage in these proceedings.

Furthermore, women are emotional creatures. Who is not to say that they abuse the rape charge to get what they want? Men have all the right to fear removing marital rape immunity when it can be so *easily* abused by spouses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;After getting through this humiliating hurdle, there are the lawyers, the courts, the media. Many rape victims drop their cases mid-way.&#8221;</p>
<p>Who do you think will be humiliated more? The man accused or the woman victim? It is highly untrue to portray, as you have, possible rape victims to be the SOLE victims. Wont it be more traumatizing for the man who has to go through a false criminal charge by a woman he considers close to him? </p>
<p>As for the reasons why woman would wish to cry rape, they are plentiful:</p>
<p><a href="http://americandaily.com/article/14242" rel="nofollow">http://americandaily.com/article/14242</a></p>
<p>In family law proceedings there are a multitude of important and emotionally-charged issues which are often contested and re-contested over many years. These include: legal and physical custody; child support; alimony; division of marital assets; liability for legal, health care and child care expenses; requests for relocation; and others. False accusations often allow accusers to gain leverage in these proceedings.</p>
<p>Furthermore, women are emotional creatures. Who is not to say that they abuse the rape charge to get what they want? Men have all the right to fear removing marital rape immunity when it can be so *easily* abused by spouses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reclaim the Night &#171; Used Brains For Sale</title>
		<link>http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Reclaim the Night &#171; Used Brains For Sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>[...] 26th, 2007 by pleinelune    Tangentially related to my earlier post about marital rape immunity, this is a cool movement I came across while tag-surfing: Alternative Energy for Reclaim the Night [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 26th, 2007 by pleinelune    Tangentially related to my earlier post about marital rape immunity, this is a cool movement I came across while tag-surfing: Alternative Energy for Reclaim the Night [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I must be stupid</title>
		<link>http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>I must be stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleinelune.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/ellenlee/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Thanks for exposing yet another clown! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for exposing yet another clown! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
